JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 20, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Juan Carlos Henao Pérez

✓
Topic · hard data
El Consejo Superior De La Carrera Notarial Solicita La Aclaración Del Auto 244-09, La Corte No Encuentra Razones Objetivas De Duda Que Impidan El Entendimiento De La Providencia, Por Lo Tanto Se Rechaza La Solicitud.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional respecto de frases o conceptos que ofrezcan verdadero motivo de duda
  • Improcedencia
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de aclaracion al auto 244 de 2009, formulada por el Consejo Superior de la Carrera Notarial.
  2. Segundo. Comuniquese la presente providencia al interesado.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by1

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.